Currupted science in mental health?

I was researching counseling and psychotherapy, it was difficult for me to know what counseling actually is in terms of what it stands for.
When I looked into it, a lot of it seems to be based on theories not properly based on scientific methods, ideas on how counselors should help their patients, which contain risks; some counselors say that their methods work, while some people get counseling for years and get no real benefits.
Much of the routes of counseling and many modern thoughts are of the kind that related to Sigmund Fraud’s ideology and methods, which I quite frankly think is an insult to science; his methods are absurd and deranged, illogical and totally unscientific in nature.
He has corrupted the mental health field for more than a hundred years, based on science far less solid than that of spiritualists and paranormal investigators.
There are plans for a diagnostic for autism to go ahead for someone, this is in part of the plans to get more staffing hours; which are needed to give them more help.
It was originally they have Aspergus Syndrome.
If there is no real scientific structure to that investigation, since it may involve a psychologists and also problems which are similar that we have experienced with psychiatrists, then the whole thing is probably a waste of time.
I should withdraw from this idea unless I can see that proper scientific methods are applied.

Now what can be done to get more staffing hours?

CREED

Posted in Psychotherapy Counseling