Currupted science in the mental health field?
I was researching counseling and psychotherapy, it was difficult for me to know what counseling actually is in terms of what it stands for.
When I looked into it, a lot of it seems to be based on theories not properly based on scientific methods, ideas on how counselors should help their patients, which contain risks; some counselors say that their methods work, while some people get counseling for years and get no real benefits.
Much of the routes of counseling and many modern thoughts are of the kind that related to Sigmund Fraud’s ideology and methods, which I quite frankly think is an insult to science; his methods are absurd and deranged, illogical and totally unscientific in nature.
He has corrupted the mental health field for more than a hundred years, based on science far less solid than that of spiritualists and paranormal investigators.
There are plans for a diagnostic for autism to go ahead for someone, this is in part of the plans to get more staffing hours; which are needed to give them more help.
It was originally they have Aspergus Syndrome.
If there is no real scientific structure to that investigation, since it may involve a psychologists and also problems which are similar that we have experienced with psychiatrists, then the whole thing is probably a waste of time.
I should withdraw from this idea unless I can see that proper scientific methods are applied.
Now what can be done to get more staffing hours?
CREED
Posted in Psychotherapy Counseling
content rss
September 7th, 2009 at 4:41 am
im not quite sure of your question either… but i do agree with you deeply about Freud he is quite sick and i still can’t believe that even today his views are respected, implemented, and even taught in the mental health field.
September 7th, 2009 at 4:41 am
Wow!!! So what was your question?
By the way, I agree with you about Freud. He disappointed me greatly when I learned he had theorized that much of the problems of his women patients were due to incest and then backed down because of the uproar that it caused. That is when he came up with his ‘penis envy’ theory. By doing so, he denied the existence of a very real problem and it has taken decades for the subject to be broached and responded to seriously as it needs to be.